Leaked Look Into Future Microsoft Stores

July 24, 2009

A source has provided the Gizmodo Web site with a design firm’s Powerpoint presentation that showcases a proposed layout, design and marketing strategy for the future Microsoft retail stores, including live wall graphics, a “Guru Bar” and rear-of-store theater. The full document also sets out Microsoft’s goals for the stores, including creating “inclusive exuberance” among its customers. Microsoft has confirmed they will open an unknown number of retail stores by year’s end, and that some of them will be adjacent to Apple’s locations. In the slide presentation by the firm Lipponcott and dated July 7, 2009, Microsoft’s stores will share an amazing number of similarities with Apple’s stores: wall-mounted display tables, center-located display tables, a service counter towards the rear of the space with customer seating, and hand-held point-of-sale computers. The space will be organized into areas, labeled in the slide presentation as PCTV, Windows 7, Smart Phone, Personalization. The sidewalls will be stocked with laptops running various Windows-based applications. According to one slide, the overall purpose of the four major areas is to “Engage, Educate and Excite.” Perhaps most interesting is a wall-sized video display that allows customers to preview software applications with an “Xbox style menu” before copying their purchased software to a “distinctive Microsoft USB flash drive.” Like the Apple stores, the Microsoft stores will feature a schedule of free events, including group training, tech presentations, live music events, and even “community events.”

Update: Late today Microsoft said the leaked document was genuine, but represents “early thinking.” However, the presentation is dated just two weeks ago and is titled an “update.”

Download (pdf) the Lippnecott presentation for all the images and strategy details.

On the strategy side, much of the Lippincott material seems to parallel Apple’s strategy. Among the “framework of guiding principles” for the stores is:

  • A differentiated in-store customer experience with a primary focus on lifestyle benefits and solutions that are relevant, engaging and fun; turning needs into wants
  • Reconsideration of the Microsoft brand by consumer (with emphasis on attracting and engaging female customers) by showing casing a unique experience, value and selection
  • World class training and education of Microsoft software across multiple OEMs and operating systems
  • Enhanced retail distribution and positive ROI for the company business groups and partners

Throughout the presentation, Lippincott uses “Emily” as the prototype customer, representing a “Basic Communicator,” “Productive Connector” or “Escapist.” She appears several times to help demonstrate how a customer would move through the store and interact with the displays and products.

The presentation provides comparisons of several competitors, using five criteria:

  • emotional / experiental branding elements
  • visual identity system and signage
  • merchandising and offers
  • fixture / materials
  • staffing

Lippincott’s presentation says that Nike stores are generally well done, but the staff “lack the sort of customer service skills shoppers expect from a premium brand like Nike.” AT&T stores received a passing grade, and Nokia fixtures were described as “museum like,” and the staff as “attired more like fashion models to appeal to customers. The Sony stores staff “can be overly aggressive or uninformed,” Lippincott said, and the fixtures are made of “relatively inexpensive materials.”

As for Apple, Lippincott’s competitive analysis found the flagship stores “have become social spots and city landmarks,” and the visual system is “consistent, strike and powerful.” They described the stores as “overstaffed with young, energetic employees trained to facilitate the exchange at each state of the customer journey.”

Like Apple, Lippincott’s strategy focuses on “the experience,” and sets out simple goals for each point in the store. For example, the entrance should elicit a customer to say, “I want to know more,” while the “Answers Bar” would spark, “I’m empowered.” The various stages would evoke, “Wow, improves my life,” while the check-out counter would generate, “I’ll be back for more.”

The presentation also provides more detailed goals and objectives for each point in the store. The storefront and window merchandising, for example, would have seasonal themes, “stimulate the senses with visually exciting and VI consistent presentation,” and align with product launches.

A key element of the design is the “digital media wall,” which can be programmed to show images on one or the entire length-of-store screen. Lippincott describes it as, “creating a magical, environmental image that magically transform (sic) the store environment for moments of ‘Inclusive Exhuberance’ in the store (i.e., globabl landscapes).”

The theater will be used to deliver the “three main pillars” of Windows 7 value proposition: sismplifies everyday tasks, makes new things possible and works the way you want.” The presentation provides several screen shots of the slides that would be show to store visitors explaining Windows 7 benefits.

The “PCTV” capabilities are prominently marketed inside the stores–watching television on your computer. The store’s demonstration area shows how “Emily” can watch TV while checking her mail or performing other Internet tasks.

The “Mobility” area focuses on laptops and smartphones. Again, the objective is to “engage, educate and excite.” The in-store demonstration shows “Emily” using the products in her everyday life.

The “Personalization” area spotlights “paint, engraving and decals,” according to Lippincott’s proposal. Several products are shown that a customer can customize, including the Zune, a PC, Xbox and netbook.

On several of the presentation’s slides, wood tables and acrylics are depicted in renderings, both very similar to Apple’s interior design.

Perhaps most interesting is the “Software” area of the store, where “Emily” is show standing at a podium, selecting software to display and run on the large wall video screen. According to one slide, “Her smart card triggers the large screen to display software she might like based on her profile and interests.” Software that she wants to purchase is immediately “burned,” the presentation says, but at another point says it’s copied to a USB flash drive.

The “primary objective and key take-away” for the Software section is stated as, “Recognized as the trusted advisor in providing an informed choice of software titles; innovative selection and purchase process optimizes merchandising and B.O.H (back-of-house) efficiencies.”

The stores will have a “Childrens PC” section, along with an area devoted to accessories.

On another slide, the purchase process is detailed: the customer previews the software, adds it to the shopping cart, and optionally saves the cart (with a link e-mailed to the customer). If the customer decides upon an in-store purchase, Lippincott says, “A store associate will be dispatched to process sales transaction with hand-held unit.” The customer can receive a printed receipt or have it e-mailed to them.

Emphasizing the “customer journey” goal of the stores, “a celebratory message welcoming Emily to the PC community is broadcast across the store.”

Lastly, the stores will have an “Answer ‘Bar,’” which in images is also called a “Guru Bar.” Lippincott put the word “Bar” in quotes in the text, apparently to differentiate it from a place where liquor is sold.

The primary objective and take-away for the Answer Bar is, “Build and restore customer relationshiop; shift perception and drive preference of the Microsoft brand with knowledgeable experts.” Images of the bar show a large wall with colorful images on it, and stools with square seats. Oddly, accompanying the rendered image is a photograph of a customer and Genius at an Apple Genius Bar.

Like a Genius Bar, the Answer Bar wall-mounted screen will display “brand messages, as well as queue status and announcements welcoming new PC users (after a sale).” The appointment process isn’t described, but those the ficticious “Emily” will receive a reminder e-mail, and also “real-time…notifications…of her place in line.”

This is a diagram included in the Lippincott presentation that shows the layout of the proposed Microsoft store. Compare this floorplan with the one immediately below, showing a typical Apple store floorplan.

This diagram below shows a typical Apple store floorplan. In some cases the tables are turned by 90 degrees.

Notice how the display table acrylics very closely resemble the ones that Apple recently installed at its stores.

E-mail this story E-mail this story

Related posts:

  1. Future Stores Will Be Bigger, Johnson Says
  2. Few Surprises at Microsoft Retail Store Opening
  3. Microsoft Arrives, Apple Store To Be Renovated
  4. Two Future Canada Stores Confirmed
  5. Future Stores in Existing Regions

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Brian Kaempen July 25, 2009 at 1329

I’m getting real sick and tired of Microsoft lately. I don’t know why they can’t just take the high road and develop quality products instead of feeling like they need to attack the “little” guy and copy them. I understand that Microsoft will never go away, but why the almost exact carbon copy of store layout? “Guru Bar”? Seriously? And an announcement proclaiming welcome “to the PC community”? How annoying will that be? I just hope that since no one will be buying software via a kiosk, then no messages will be broadcast. If Microsoft via Lippincott has studied Apple stores that much, didn’t they discover how “kiosks” don’t work, a la the ones in Apple’s Mini stores? I hope these designs fail just as Gateway did, or at least if they don’t, they become way too much of a money drain for Microsoft and they need to drastically alter their retail strategy.

I guess imitation is the highest form of flattery.

-Brian

Reply

2 Brian Kaempen July 25, 2009 at 1355

Oh, and there’s a picture of an Apple store with last year’s nano display under the “Storefront” section. It’s a flagship store, but one with a straight staircase. Don’t think it’s Chicago nor San Fran, may be New York or L.A., but not sure.

-Brian

Reply

3 Apple User July 25, 2009 at 1413

They should just name themselves MicroApple and be done with it, pathetic no talent copycats that they are…

Good luck getting an appt at the “guru” bar. It’ll look like a U2 concert with everyone trying to remove their viruses.

Reply

4 RattyUK July 25, 2009 at 1638

@ Brian

The Store is London, Regent Street. Ironic on that slide the “Consistant branding” of Apple products is illustrated with the Apple logo back to front (it is shot from the inside of the store and therefore not the outward facing side of the logo.

Reply

5 George July 26, 2009 at 1524

Fundamentally the design and operation of the Apple Store is to sell products and services through an excellent customer centric experience. Therefore, traffic and sales inform what is valuable and important to customers and explains the evolution of the Store [and Apple Products].

MS Store is imitating the appearance not the underlying rationale, processes, etc., and as such is really a very big [and expensive] ad campaign that will be hard to sort out.

MS commercial keeps pushing we are cheap[er] [aka Walmart] and this is not a message that premium shopping centers really want.

How MS reconciles mimic of Apple Store without a real sales product plan model, unable to really do Genius [too many PC models finger pointing between MS and HP/Dell], we are cheap in premium locations, etc., is a mystery to me?

This will be a real challenge to be successful for MS. The fundamentals are not there merely the veneer and so will quickly become expensive and I suspect a target for ridicule.

Hiring Walmart exec to execute a premier “store-like thingy” seems absolutely silly, Walmart sells products with very lean operations to a segment of the population that Apple has not invested effort towards. This is the same Walmart that tried to go upscale [organic foods, designer clothes, etc.] and failed. This is not a store so Walmart expertise [while terrific for Target or supermarket] is not the focus or talent needed.

It does not compute. At the end of the day, this is merely “me too” fixation by MS as demonstrated by Windows 7, Bing, Xbox, MSvideo [now dead], MSN [versus AOL], Zune, Netscape Browser, etc. This does not make business sense and shows how so much profit margin can be so casually wasted.

Reply

6 Dino July 27, 2009 at 0818

Pathetic and desperate… kind of like their decision to hire Michael Forrest as DOS (if he’s still employed there)

Reply

7 Mike Kaufmann July 27, 2009 at 1033

Well, there goes Microsoft following another successful lead by Apple. They’ve already hired the Apple Vice President for Retail Real Estate, Blankenship, when the one they really needed was Ron Johnson. But, I’m sure Ron is so happy in his work at Apple, he wouldn’t leave! And the Apple Stores are so much a product of Ron’s leadership, I can’t imagine Apple without him!

Reply

8 Pirate August 3, 2009 at 1242

Wow Dino. Do we really need to start launching personal attacks against former ARS employees via the IFO forums? Michael Forrest did a good job at Apple, helped turn around a some struggling markets, and most of his teams loved him. Perhaps you did not, but that gives you absolutely no right to attack him. It really only makes you look pathetic.

Personally, I think Microsoft is lucky to have Forrest. He’s very talented. I’d entertain working for him any day – even though I never did at Apple.

Reply

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>