By all outward appearance, Apple’s retail stores are a model for the Green Movement that encourages business to be considerate of ecological and environmental issues. But behind the stainless steel, glass and plastic, it’s difficult to tell if the stores’ natural materials really contribute to the preserving the planet. Part of the problem in evaluating Apple’s stores, or any retail operation, is that there are no clear industry standards for evaluating how Green the operation is. Even so, it’s possible to shed some light on two issues: where did the materials come from, and where are they going?
First and foremost, Apple uses lots of natural and recyclable materials when it designs and builds the stores: stainless steel, glass, stone and wood. This means the materials could have come from used or renewable sources, and once the stores decay in 1,000 years, the materials can be recycled.
On the other hand, certain of the materials had to be transported thousands of miles, generating “negative credits” for the pollution created by moving them to the United States. The stainless steel has to travel 5,100 miles to the west coast, probably by ship. The stone travels 4,800 miles to the east coast from Italy, also probably by ship. The window glass and wood come from the United States and Canada respectively, but glass for high-profile store staircases comes from Germany, a trip of at least 3,500 miles by ship.
The maple wood used for early store floors and current furniture comes from Canada, and is completely renewable. There is no current shortage of the timber, and in fact it’s a Canadian export industry.
The manufacturing of glass is a complicated process, and typically includes using small amounts of metals. In Apple’s case, some glass is specified as “low-iron,” but it’s not clear how environmentally friendly the window or staircase glass really is.
Like other commercial construction, Apple’s stores may incidentally use some recycled materials. Mall stores use aluminum studs for wall supports, which may include recycled content and are themselves entirely recyclable. Copper water pipes and electrical wiring may also come from recycled or recyclable materials.
Otherwise, with rare exceptions, none of the building materials for an Apple store have been recycled or re-used. Mall stores, in particular, consist of new materials. A few stores have retained a heritage building’s façade, perhaps qualifying it as “re-used” construction. The Buchanan Street (Glasgow) store retained the building’s historic stone walls, and the future Covent Garden (London) will retain the building’s large timber interior supports and flooring.
The operation of the stores is hit-and-miss. Most stores have a wide opening either to the outside or to the open air, putting an extra burden on the stores heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems (HVAC). While the back-lit Apple logos and sidewall graphics are lit with low-energy fluorescent tubes, most overhead lighting remains “tungsten filament” based, which consumes much more electricity. Both types of lighting, however, generate considerable heat.
On the display floor, power consumption and heat generation are obvious. A typical mall store has over 40 computers on display, along with a heat-generating Apple TV. Tallying up the computer displays, kids section, training and demo areas and the Genius Bar, a typical Apple store is consuming 3,640 watts from computers and displays when they are not sleeping.
Comparing that figure with average household use brings a surprise. Based on typical operating hours for a mall store (72), an Apple store consumes over 1,135 kilowatt (kwH) of electricity per month. In comparison, the average U.S. household consumes from about 1,000 to 1,300 kwH per month, depending upon the region of the country. Apple’s figure excludes lighting and HVAC, which would add substantially to the load. But it also includes low-power laptops that have miserly power consumption.
Two Apple stores have rooftop gardens that bring some real green to the stores, as well as provide some degree of environmental benefits. While thorough research hasn’t been performed, there’s widespread belief that rooftop lawns can lower a city’s “urban heat island effect.” More obvious is the plant’s ability to generate oxygen and provide cover for the roofing materials, which extend their life. Both the North Michigan Avenue (Chicago) and Boylston Street (Boston) stores have bright green roofs.
On the downside, green roofs require additional construction, both structurally to support the weight of the planting system, as well as drainage and watering systems. All of these additional systems generate negative credits due to manufacturing.
The stores have an indirect method of contributing to the environment–they’re a collection point for recycling products under certain conditions. Apple stores will accept iPods and product batteries at any time (10 percent discount on a new iPod, too!), and will also enroll you in a program to recycle old computers or monitors when you purchase a new one at the store.
[IFO - Thanks to commenters who noted that Apple offers to e-mail receipts to buyers, instead of generating a paper-based receipt that claimed the life of a tree. On the other hand, Apple produces thousands of T-shirts each year for store employees, for which there is no formal recycling program. We can only hope that employees see that the shirts are passed along or otherwise responsibly recycled.]
You can find much more information on Apple’s environmental Web page. Apple has also posted specific environment information about its products.
Chicago has a Green Roof project that provides financial incentives to businesses.
E-mail this story
Related posts:
{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }
If the Apple wants its stores to be more “green”, they should stop using the plastic shopping bags. I think that makes a bigger impact. How many Apple store customers recycle those bags? I worry more about the plastic bags that we get from Apple stores and other retail operations ending up in landfills than I worry about transporting building materials to the stores. I am not a believer in Al Gore’s global warming crisis so, it doesn’t bother me at all to find out that Apple is importing material from far away sources.
I was shocked to find out that if you buy a replacement battery at an Apple Store, they will not take back the old battery for recycling. This happened to me at San Diego Fashion Valley. They told me to just throw it in the trash.
as an employee i can only say sorry to the guy named mike
he was given wrong information at the store
apple will take an battery or any old product and we collect it and every week or once a month depending on how much we have, we send it to corporate and they dispose of it properly
Again I’ll speak for the North Michigan Avenue store. I know that in the summertime, both main doors are wide open, and you can feel the AC from about 10′ away-not at all environmental. Then again, the store was at one point the top earner, so how much do we think Apple cares about being “green”? They put on a good face, especially to Greenpeace which I see all around Chicago a lot, but we don’t really now how much is going on until they publish some real stats.
-Brian
FWIW, when my MBP’s batteries both started expanding, Apple took back both batteries.
Lets not get into the amount of T-shirts employees get given in a year or quarter. And since they are ” Apple ” property they do not allow them to be given to charity. But there there is no serial # to track them or names if someone was to give them away.
Apple stores have no recycle program for waste of paper until this year. But how many retailers offer a emailed receipt?
Gr$£££n Peace my Arse!
From what I know of their operations, they are as close to a paperless office as I’ve seen in actual practice.
They email receipts.
Rebates are submitted electronically.
The plastic bags are high quality and the ones I tend to save reuse the most. Also they have made a concerted effort to use less and less packaging. And the boxes that ipods and iPhones come in are nice enough that I bet few people toss them.
Laminated glass – stairs, storefronts – is not readily, if at all, recyclable. And an AC-ed greenhouse in the middle of Sydney, Australia, with no low energy coating, is far from green. Ditto no insulation in the New York winter (cube).
“…but it’s not clear how environmentally friendly the window or staircase glass really is.”
The glass is this eco-friendly: not at all.
Aluminum and steel also have a high embodied energy and poor insulation values. Don’t kid yourselves – the stores are, on the whole, definitely not green!
I’m not sure what the point of this story is. Apple stores are about pushing a retail presence and selling more product. Even if the stores were re-used dairy barns, the underlying concept (i.e. promoting a consumerist lifestyle) would still be problematic for the environment.
I’m an architect and I can tell you for sure that 99.5% of what gets built today is detrimental to the environment, even when the architects and engineers do their best.
So basically, few buildings constructed after the Industrial Revolution could be considered green. It’s easy to get caught up in the “movement,” and architects want to talk up their environmental stance, but they won’t hesitate to spend extra client dollars on expensive eco-bling, add aluminum and stainless steel where appropriate, and take aesthetic shortcuts that compromise any real environmental agenda.