ifoAppleStore.com


Also read...


e-mail this story e-mail this story

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url

I think that you will see Apple start to fill out the states with single stores with more store openings.

Also I am happy to see new stores in traditionally Windows strong holds.

With the growth of acceptance of Macs so too we are seeing a growth Mac-related jobs such as technicians and consultants.

I know because I’ve been there.

Former MG November 14, 2007 at 7:26 am

Where’s Delaware (DE)? Doesn’t Apple have a store at the Christiana Mall in Newark, DE? [IFO - Hmmmm. OK, omission fixed.]

oaklandgayasian November 14, 2007 at 6:05 pm

I didn’t see Nebraska (Villiage Pointe Shopping Center, Omaha, NE) on the graph. Otherwise, I appreciate the information. I’ve been wondering about these stats. Thanks! [IFO - These figures cover the third fiscal quarter, from July 1st to Sept. 30th, so not all current stores and states are listed.]

Jason November 14, 2007 at 8:15 pm

My, aren’t we picky. Now it is missing Kentucky and Nebraska. We are not complaining. Just trying to be accurate. Is there a list on individual stores?
I’m really interested in how the Hawaii stores compare. Also how does a lifestyle center store compare to a store in a full shopping center, such as Aspen Grove and Park Meadows in Colorado. [IFO - I'll get Nebraska added, but Kentucky opened too late to be included in the financial listing. No individual store listings are available.]

Mark Wilson November 14, 2007 at 9:38 pm

Aren’t these graphs basically worthless since they are not normalized to population? Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics.

Don’t get me wrong.. I think there is something interesting in the raw data behind these graphs. I just think these graphs are pointless representations of that data.

Against population density, median age, age distributions, store count density, or other more meaningful metrics the data could be interesting.

my $0.02

Douglas Fils November 15, 2007 at 8:13 am

Delaware beats California in average revenue per store. That’s awesome.

(Then again, given that there’s no sales tax in DE and it’s on a highway easily accessible from 3 surrounding states with highish sales tax, not so surprising.)

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater November 15, 2007 at 9:58 am

What about VA? And why M & W on the top chart and just W on the bottom? What are they?

db November 15, 2007 at 10:11 am

Also, the coolest way to measure this would be sales/sq ft by state.

Alan November 15, 2007 at 11:32 am

Thanks for the all the input about the graph. For some reason this one proved difficult for me to get into graph form and proof read. This latest edit should take care of all the problems, and I’ve added a per-capita spending graph.

Gary November 15, 2007 at 1:54 pm

What about the Canadian (and other international) stores? [IFO - Sources sometimes have limited information, or are unwilling to share everything they know.]

gozer November 16, 2007 at 9:59 pm

Which California store had the highest revenue?

And the reader above, who makes the point that this data could be better understood if population density (and other factors) are taken into consideration, has a very good point.

Thibault H. November 20, 2007 at 10:37 am
Your comments...

 Name (required)

 E-mail address (required, not posted.)

 Website (optional)

Create an avatar for your comment entry!