http://www.ifoapplestore.com/db/2007/10/09/is-34th-street-active-again/ news and information about Apple Inc.'s retail stores Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:21:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 http://www.ifoapplestore.com/db/2007/10/09/is-34th-street-active-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15931 Joe R Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:49:06 +0000 http://www.ifoapplestore.com/db/2007/10/09/is-34th-street-active-again/#comment-15931 The artist's renderings look very similar to the design of the recently-opened New York Times building, on 8th Avenue between 40th and 41st Streets, across from the Port Authority Bus Terminal. On the Times building, the horizontal bars are ceramic rods, and the overall glass-and-metal look is pretty much the same, especially on the lower, horizontal floors of the 52-story tower. The artist’s renderings look very similar to the design of the recently-opened New York Times building, on 8th Avenue between 40th and 41st Streets, across from the Port Authority Bus Terminal. On the Times building, the horizontal bars are ceramic rods, and the overall glass-and-metal look is pretty much the same, especially on the lower, horizontal floors of the 52-story tower.

]]> http://www.ifoapplestore.com/db/2007/10/09/is-34th-street-active-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15928 Peter Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:24:08 +0000 http://www.ifoapplestore.com/db/2007/10/09/is-34th-street-active-again/#comment-15928 You've misinterpreted the document by overlooking the first part of the sentence. "Pursuant to the terms of an executed, triple-net lease agreement..." (page 11), Apple is obliged to build. Apple's obligation to build only kicked in if it had signed a lease agreement. Since, apparently, it never did sign a lease, it's not obligated to build a store on the site. There's nothing here to see. [IFO -- Thanks for the legal reading of this deal. It would have been a great-looking store!] You’ve misinterpreted the document by overlooking the first part of the sentence. “Pursuant to the terms of an executed, triple-net lease agreement…” (page 11), Apple is obliged to build. Apple’s obligation to build only kicked in if it had signed a lease agreement. Since, apparently, it never did sign a lease, it’s not obligated to build a store on the site. There’s nothing here to see. [IFO -- Thanks for the legal reading of this deal. It would have been a great-looking store!]

]]> http://www.ifoapplestore.com/db/2007/10/09/is-34th-street-active-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15888 JoeB Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:03:24 +0000 http://www.ifoapplestore.com/db/2007/10/09/is-34th-street-active-again/#comment-15888 Wow. Wow.

]]>