<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giant Cube Billboard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ifoapplestore.com/db/2007/03/13/giant-cube-billboard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ifoapplestore.com/db/2007/03/13/giant-cube-billboard/</link>
	<description>news and information about Apple Inc.'s retail stores</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Muir</title>
		<link>http://www.ifoapplestore.com/db/2007/03/13/giant-cube-billboard/comment-page-1/#comment-3053</link>
		<dc:creator>John Muir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ifoapplestore.com/2007/03/13/giant-cube-billboard/#comment-3053</guid>
		<description>Not a great image for the translucent look anyway. That photo's all about solid colour, not outlines. Strange that it would be put up. Brian has an interesting take on it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a great image for the translucent look anyway. That photo&#8217;s all about solid colour, not outlines. Strange that it would be put up. Brian has an interesting take on it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Kaemepn</title>
		<link>http://www.ifoapplestore.com/db/2007/03/13/giant-cube-billboard/comment-page-1/#comment-3040</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kaemepn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ifoapplestore.com/2007/03/13/giant-cube-billboard/#comment-3040</guid>
		<description>There's a huge discussion that continues over at macrumors after the posted photos,  but one of the big reasons why it may have been taken down is due to violation of public space.  With the ad up, the building is no longer entirely see-through and also the fact that the apple logo was suppose to be the only advertising on said building.  I don't want to get into that argument here, but either way, for it being up for only a couple hours, it's definitely garnered enough attention.

-Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a huge discussion that continues over at macrumors after the posted photos,  but one of the big reasons why it may have been taken down is due to violation of public space.  With the ad up, the building is no longer entirely see-through and also the fact that the apple logo was suppose to be the only advertising on said building.  I don&#8217;t want to get into that argument here, but either way, for it being up for only a couple hours, it&#8217;s definitely garnered enough attention.</p>
<p>-Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
